Tag Archives: faith

Why I am was at Wheaton

Before I walked into my room on the sixth floor of Traber dorm at Wheaton College, I had taken the time to sit down and write a statement to myself about why I was going to be spending the next few years of my life in that place.  Writing out this mission statement was probably the most impacting and influencial step I took in making my time in college worthwhile. 
For those new and current students who come across this post, I strongly encourage you to write your own statement and post it in a prominent place in your room.  Because I was intentional about them, most of the statements below of proven true.

WHY I AM AT WHEATON…

I believe God has called me here.
1.He got me in despite my shortcomings
2.He’s provided the finances to be here

I am at one of the best Christian academic schools in the world because God wants me here.

God has called me here to…
-Learn about him and his work in many areas.
-To interact and study under some of the smartest Christians in their particular field in the world, and learn to glorify God in that area.
-To be a part of a body of young people eager for God
-To get a degree (because I have been afforded this opportunity)
-To be a light of God’s truth to the people around me
-To root myself in the factual evidence of God’s truth that I may stand on that firm foundation of God’s word.

“…And we take Captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.”
–I Cor. 10:5

When I think about my time at Wheaton I undoubtedly think of the many wonderful friendships that I have built through my time there.  I also look back with few regrets about where my priorities were.  There are many who look back wishing they had went to more classes, read more of the books, visited with more of the professors.  No one I know wishes they had slept through more of their college years.  I say all this to encourage current Wheaton students and any other college students to be intentional about your time.  The parties will be forgotten. 

Financial Clarification

This is the third time I am trying to write this post to clarify where my thoughts and views concerning my financial lessons come from. The reason I felt it was important to try and do this was because I feel like a few readers have misunderstood what I am saying and I want to try and make sense of it. Let’s just say I haven’t found the right words yet. Here is my third and final meager attempt.
I feel like some of what I have shared of views on finances have come across as a masochistic, vow of poverty, money is evil standpoint. That is not what I have intended by the things I have written.

I am not a masochist. I don’t like Pain. I don’t think Christ enjoyed pain either, yet for some reason he endured the cross. Like Christ there might be times we sacrifice at our own expense for the sake of others. When I say Christ calls us to give sacrificially I don’t intend 1) for that to be painful, nor 2) to do it for the pleasure of it being painful. If anything I am a hedonist. I believe God created us to love others and he has equipped us with the resources to do that in a lot of ways. I say we give sacrificially because we were created to.

I am not promoting taking a vow of poverty. Christ did say blessed our the poor, but I don’t think he meant we should all try to become poor in order to be blessed. I am not saying become poor for the sake of becoming poor. Yet, I should be open to the possibility that my following Christ call to love and give to the needs of others might result in my becoming “poor” by the worlds standards. Jesus did not tell the rich young ruler to “become poor” but he did tell him to sell all his possessions to meet the needs of those around him. I need to be willing to go there if I am going to carry out Christ call on my life to love those around me.

I don’t believe money is evil. When I say we should practice giving away our money with out so much concern for whose pocket it ends up in I don’t mean to do it because money is bad and you might as well stick it through a shredder. (I should have said buy a bunch of bottles of Root Beer and candy bars and leave them in odd places through out the town). Money is simply a means of trade. We should be sure not to elevate it too highly. God calls us to be a good steward of what he has given us, and I have every intention of doing so. God also calls us to love our neighbors and care for their needs, and I have every intention of doing that as well. These both involve money, but I don’t think they are in conflict with one another.

I’ll leave you with this word picture that hopefully will help you understand my perspective. One day your walking along and God shows up and says: “You are my child and you can have anything and everything in the entire world that you would like.” This is better then winning a million bucks, it’s better then getting a genie and three wishes, you can have ANYTHING. A couple of things to keep in mind though. God says you should love your neighbor as yourself and we’ve got 6 billion of them. He is also not going to make things out of thin air, what you choose is from what is available on the earth currently. The more I take the less that is available to others. And by the way there is a big line behind you (6 billion) of God’s children who are going to choose from what’s left when your done.
So what do you choose?

Jesus and Immigrants: The Gospel vs. H.R. 4437

My good friend Logan alerted me to this issue, via a NY Times article:

…H.R. 4437, a bill sponsored by James Sensenbrenner Jr. of Wisconsin and Peter King of New York. This grab bag legislation, which was recently passed by the House, would expand the definition of “alien smuggling” in a way that could theoretically include working in a soup kitchen, driving a friend to a bus stop or caring for a neighbor’s baby.

Logan writes further on his own experience and previous similiar legislation from two years ago:

At that point in time, Tom Tancredo Republican, Colorado was trying to tack on legislation that would deputize all municipal police forces as members of the Department of Homeland Security. This would require all police officers to ascertain residency and citizenship status with any case. In other words, give people with little protection a reason to AVOID seeking help from the police. In an earlier bill, he had wanted to deputize emergency room personel. All persons seeking help at a hospital would be required to prove their status – a mother and her children could be deported simply for seeking to save her children’s life by going to the emergency room. Thus, if you’re an illegal immigrant, you should avoid going to the police OR to the hospital. He was defeated. Unfortunately, similar ideas are gathering steam, as one can see by following the proposed immigration laws.

Hopefully these thoughts have given you some understanding as to why you should take a few minutes and look at the information below and call your Senators TODAY. (Anyone can call, but if your from IL, OH, KS, IA, WI, AL, AZ, CA, DE, MA, NY, OK, PA, SC, TX, UT or VT PLEASE take the time to call your Senators because they are on the Judiciary Committee)

(Email Below from Daniel Stutz of World Relief)

Please print this out, then call both your Senators this THURSDAY, March 9! Here’s what’s up:

The Senate began the debate on comprehensive immigration reform last week, and will report its final mark-up of the bill to the Senate floor on March 16. Given that Representative Sensenbrenner’s draconian anti-immigration bill (H.R. 4437) already passed the House in December 2005, any hope of safeguarding immigrants’ rights rest exclusively in what the Senate decides to do this spring.

Tomorrow, Thursday, March 9, is National Call-In Day for Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

Please call tomorrow to our Senators’ offices and ask to speak with the Immigration aide.

Senator Durbin from Illinois is on the Judiciary Committee deciding first steps on this issue!

Call Senator Richard Durbin: 202-224-2152 Ask to speak with Joe Zogby

Call Senator Barack Obama: 202-224-2854 Ask to speak with Danny Sepulveda

If your are not from Illinois, check the list below to see if your Senator is on the Judiciary Committee. You can find the name of your Senators by typing in your zip code at www.congress.org. The Congressional switchboard number is 202/224-3121.

If the aide is not available, ask for the aide’s voice mail. Whether speaking to the aide personally, or leaving a message, here is what to say:

” My name is _____ (affiliations). I live in (name of town & state). I am calling regarding “The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006″ which is being considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee introduced last week by Chairman Specter. I am concerned about provisions that will only worsen our broken immigration system which desperately needs reform. Please recommend amendments which would provide the undocumented population an opportunity to earn permanent residency, and, if they choose, citizenship. Also please support any efforts to strengthen worker protections in the new temporary worker program. Finally, please try to remove harsh provisions of House bill H.R. 4437 which are also present in the Senate Bill, such as the criminalization of undocumented presence; the denial of permanent residency to a refugee who commits a minor offense; and the criminalization of the use of a fraudulent passport even by asylum-seekers who cannot obtain valid documents from their governments. We are a nation of immigrants, built on the promise of liberty, opportunity and fairness. Undocumented migrants work hard, pay taxes, and seek a better life for their families. It is wrong to treat immigrants as criminals. Please contact me at ___ (your tel #) with your reply.”

Background on the issues follow below, with additional talking points you may wish to use in a conversation with your Senators. The names and contact information for each Senator on the Judiciary Committee are also below. Please first call Senators Durbin and Obama, and then call as many of the remaining members of the Committee as you are able to in order to strongly voice your concern. Each call will average only 2 minutes of your time, and could mean the difference between restoring a workable, sensible, just bill to the Senate, OR facing the end of two centuries of protection for immigrants and refugees.

Megan Nelson

Public Policy Coordinator

Gary L. Cozette, Director
Chicago Religious Leadership Network on Latin America (CRLN)
Tel: 773/293-2964 mnelson@crln.org

Background :

Last Friday March 3, Senator Specter of Pennsylvania, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, unveiled his “Chairman’s Mark” on immigration, an amalgam of several different immigration bills that have been circulating in the Senate.

THE “CHAIRMAN’S MARK” WOULD:

* Severely restrict judicial review for immigrants and asylum seekers (Title VII);

* Continue and expand the detention of non-criminal asylum seekers;

* Criminalize anyone who knowingly uses a false passport or immigration-related document, with no exception for refugees, asylum seekers, children, or other vulnerable populations (Title II, Sec. 208 and 209);

* * Criminalize anyone who is out of status, including asylum seekers, trafficking victims, battered women, and abused children who fall out of status while they are figuring out how to obtain protection (Title II, Sec. 206);

* * Create a positive temporary worker program, but would fail to provide a path to legalization for immigrant workers, and would require those who enter under the program to waive all rights to administrative or judicial review (Title IV and Title VI).

THIS BILL WILL IMPACT ALL IMMIGRANTS: children, asylum seekers, trafficking victims, battered women, refugees, the undocumented and lawful permanent residents. There is virtually no non-citizen whom this bill will not touch.

THE TIME TO ACT IS NOW! The fate of the Chairman’s Mark could mean the most drastic and devastating overhaul of our immigration and asylum system since the 1996 reform bills. We have only one more week to educate Judiciary Committee members, impact what comes out of committee, and change the tide. Anti-immigrants are hitting Capital Hill in droves and we have to counter their efforts.

Talking Points
* You support comprehensive immigration reform.
First, we must make sure the legislation deals realistically and sensibly with people already living and working in our country without legal status. It is neither realistic nor desirable to round up and deport 11 million people. But the Specter proposal will exclude many undocumented from ever becoming part of America’s future, thereby perpetuating the problem of illegality the bill must solve.

* Undocumented persons need a legal process to remain working in this country.
Second, the Specter mark requires that future flow immigrant workers leave the U.S . for a minimum of a year after two three-year temporary visas. Forcing trained and established workers to leave the U.S. after six years will either disrupt businesses in the U.S. if it works, or result in a burgeoning population of workers who “jump the program” and remain illegally.

*Persons of faith are called to treat the immigrant with compassion.
Third, the Specter bill draws on some of the more problematic provisions of the House-passed Sensenbrenner bill ( H.R. 4437). It criminalizes immigrants without papers, which may amount to a backdoor effort to force state and local police to add immigration enforcement to their already full platter of duties. It also expands the definition of “alien smuggling” so that people who come in normal, everyday contact with undocumented immigrants may be criminally charged.

*All persons have a right to due process.
Finally, to even participate in the plan the Chairman envisions, undocumented immigrants must sign away access to judicial review, the ability to redress errors in paperwork, and meaningful appeals while seeking legal status. They could not appeal a future deportation ruling through the legal system, for example. The courthouse door will slam in the face of millions of immigrants hoping to put themselves on the right side of the law.

SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Richard Durbin (D-IL)

Phone: (202) 224-2152

Fax: (202) 228-0400

Mike DeWine (R-OH)

Phone: (202) 224-2315

Fax: (202) 224-6519

Sam Brownback (R-KS)

Phone: (202) 224-6521

Fax: (202) 228-1265

Charles Grassley (R-IA)

Phone: (202) 224-3744

Fax: (202) 224-6020

Herbert Kohl (D-WI)

Phone: (202) 224-5653

Fax: (202) 224-9787

Russ Feingold (D-WI)

Phone: (202) 224-5323

Fax: (202) 224-2725

Jeff Sessions (R-AL)

Phone: (202) 224-4124

Fax: (202) 224-3149

Jon Kyl (R-AZ)

Phone: (202) 224-4521

Fax: (202) 224-2207

Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)

Phone: (202) 224-3841

Fax: (202) 228-3954

Joseph Biden (D-DE)

Phone: (202) 224-5042

Fax: (202) 224-0139

Edward Kennedy (D-MA)

Phone: (202) 224-4543

Fax: (202) 224-2417

Charles Schumer (D-NY)

Phone: (202) 224-6542

Fax: (202) 228-3027

Tom Coburn (R-OK)

Phone: (202) 224-5754

Fax: (202) 224-6008

Arlen Specter (R-PA)

Phone: (202) 224-4254

Fax: (202) 228-1229

Lindsey Graham (R-SC)

Phone: (202) 224-5972

Fax: (202) 224-3808

John Cornyn (R-TX)

Phone: (202) 224-2934

Fax: (202) 228-2856

Orrin Hatch (R-UT)

Phone: (202) 224-5251

Fax: (202) 224-6331

Patrick Leahy (D-VT)

Phone: (202) 224-4242

Fax: (202) 224-3479

Your problem with Giving is probably You.

Financial lesson #2: Giving

I think most of us, if we are completely honest with ourselves, are quite selfish even in our giving.
When I give I want it to be on my terms. I don’t like a knock on my window when I pull up to the stoplight asking for some money for lunch. They should know the only change I have is for emergencies and this doesn’t qualify. I’m much more comfortable knowing that I commited to paying $30 a month to sponsor a child, and it will cost me just $30.
When I give my hard earned money I want it to go to a deserving organization. I want to feel good about it. I often want to be recognized for it. I mean, after all, isn’t this my money I’m giving away?
Many of the thoughts I mentioned above are perfectly okay, but there are a few reasons that sometimes they are not. You see, a major part of the call to give is to teach you that money is not your god or master.
Take Jesus’ encounter with the rich young ruler* as an example (I’m not a ruler, but I sure feel young and rich). Did Jesus ask him to give everything he had so that the needs of the poor would be met? That was probably one reason. Most of us recognize though, that it was very much about him being willing to let go, and follow Christ. I far too often hear the response to that passage being that we aren’t required to give everything away, we just should be willing to if God ever asked it of us (and lo and behold I know not one person who God has ever asked to give away all they had).
Well today is the day. It’s time to for you to open your tight fist and release your tight grip on money, so that you can grip easily the hand of God. Today we stop making excuses and being self-centered in our giving, instead we give because we NEED to give to release our tight grip on money; to acknowledge that money is not our god.

Your Assignment for the Week/month: Take $100 (For most people with an income that’s probably less then half your tithe each month) out of the bank in $1 bills. Over the next month: give to anyone who asks, drop bills in places they’ll be found, try to give a dollar to a random stranger, hide them in findable places at work, drop them out the window at a school bus stop. Have fun, and give with no expectations or qualifications on your giving.

A Major Flaw of Wheaton College

A Major Flaw of Wheaton CollegeA friend of mine asked me to reflect on my time at Wheaton and expressed a little about what I have learned from my time there. Rather then bring up a number of unrelated things in one post I thought I would just post as the reasons and situations come to mind.
I had the great opportunity to met with the Chaplain at Wheaton for an exit interview in the spring of my senior year. At gave me a chance to reflect on the good and bad of my time and I came up with a handful of things that I thought where the most wide spread, not necessarily just specific to my personal experience. The one I had the hardest time explaining is the one I’ll start with: The lifestyle of Wheaton College instills underlying assumptions that keep us from following Christ fully.

When I first got to Wheaton I thoroughly enjoyed the nice big dorm rooms, the fancy Lego-like furniture; I loved the food at the cafeteria and the fact that people cleaned up after me everywhere I went. I enjoyed seeing the flowers planted around campus and the nice architecture. The Student Rec Center was state-of-the-art and the classrooms had all the technology needs you could imagine. I enjoyed all of these things, and I justified in my mind that during my time of diligent studies it was nice to be in a comfortable environment with everything taken care of. Sophomore year, a campaign to build a $20 million student center began, and I suddenly realized the great tragedy of having all we had at Wheaton.

You see, when you sit in a “Christian” Institution, listening to a “Christian” teacher, amongst “Christian” peers, you have an immediate assumption that the Lifestyle, the buildings, the spending being done in your community is therefore “Christian.” But that is not necessarily true.

When you sit in the coffee shop of an extravagant student center and read Jesus words about caring for the poor, it is hard to acknowledge that your fancy community might be in conflict with really carrying that out.

I fear too many students have left Wheaton with this assumption: I can buy a big house, an expensive car, fancy clothes and furniture, take exotic vacations, live the high society life, AND still follow Christ call to take up their cross and follow him.

Lying ‘to do God a service’?

I’ve been doing a bit of catching up on my Bible reading and have recently been hanging out in the book of Job. Now, you’ve got to wonder about the book of Job. Most of the time it’s summed up by a preacher in about three chapters (the first two and then the last one), basically they say: Job’s a good guy, devil asks to test him, God let’s him take away everything Job has and even gives him boils, Job doesn’t curse God, and in the end God comes in a violent storm and then returns to Job double what he originally had, the end.
What we barely ever spend much time on is the nearly 40 chapters of conversation between Job and his three ‘counseling’ friends. I could be wrong but I think that is the longest conversation that there is in the Bible, and it’s an definite argument no less. And I’ve been spending the past two days sitting in the midst of these arguing friends, and boy is it something.

I think there are a ton of situations where you could apply some of the wisdom found here, like don’t argue with someone who just lost everything, but I think you can figure those out. Instead, I’d like to just point out one of the interesting passages I ran across that I think might lend us some insight. (This is from The Message, I looked at the NIV too and I think it’s a acceptable translation)

Job to his friends:
“are you going to keep on lying ‘to do God a service’?
to make up stories ‘to get him off the hook’?
Why do you always take his side?
Do you think he needs a lawyer to defend himself?
How would you fare if you were in the dock?
Your lies might convince a jury-but would they convince God?
He’d reprimand you on the spot
if he detected a bias in your witness.
Doesn’t his splendor put you in awe?
Aren’t you afraid to speak cheap lies before him?”

Have you been there? Eagerly trying to ‘defend God’ with your human wisdom? Is that why we are so into apologetics and theological study?

I wonder if our lack of awe at this concept of god we argue the case of, is the very thing that keeps those we argue against from seeing the splendor and standing in awe of the true living God?

On using icons and depictions of Jesus in the church

In church the other day I was surprised to see two small paintings toward the front of the building depicting Jesus. I recognized them and I believe the appropriate term for them is an “icon.” (I could definitely be wrong on that).

White JesusThey where obviously painted a few centuries ago. They didn’t look exactly like this but similar. By similar I mean it was the long haired white Jesus we seem to see portrayed everywhere we look. So much so I think we actually think he looked something like that. Now I don’t know much about historical looks and fashions but I’m fairly confident that is NOT what he looked like.

Jesus JesusIn fact, I just so happened to see that educational show the other day where they went through all kinds of evidence and have come to the conclusion that he looked something like this. I’m really not quite sure if they are right, but at least they gave it a good long consideration.

Black JesusNow the reason I’m bringing this up is mainly that I think it’s a dangerous and troubling thing that we’ve got all these white Jesus pictures hanging around. The main argument I hear in response when I bring this up is that they are historical, and thus because of their history have value, regardless of how inaccurate they are. I think that is just ridiculous. I also hear people talk about how Jesus becomes like one of us, so a white church can have a white Jesus, a Hispanic church can have a Hispanic Jesus, etc. Now if we are happy and content with our racial divided churches then this might seem slightly feasible, especially if we wanted to promote our racial superiority in our theology (That was extremely sarcastic and I hope you see the terrible flaws in it). I’ll write more at some point about the damage these sorts of imagery cause to children with different skin colors (then the one on the Jesus picture).
For now, I’d just like to say to every person who goes to a church where there are white Jesus’ hanging around, that it’s time you either get a vastly more accurate picture of what Jesus looked like, or you start putting up more depictions of Jesus from other cultures. I guess next Sunday I should bring in this depiction of Jesus.

free-will vs. predestination: I’m NOT a robot.

I probably won’t get to my thoughts about the Biblical foundations about free-will and predestination in this post at all. Rather, I’d like to address one of the dangers that comes up when we start to get honest and talk about this subject. Listen carefully and you might pick up on which direction I lean.

First and foremost, I am NOT a robot. I know you where probably constructing your theories and questioning whether the pictures are real, but seriously I’m not. What I mean by saying this is to address the most common response I hear from people when they are presented with the idea of predestination. IF predestination is true they say, then no choice they make is their own, they are a robot pre-programmed for every action. Therefore, one might say, what is the use of doing anything? I’ll just sit here, cause obviously that’s what God predestined me to do right?
Whether I believe theologically in predestination or not, I am still personally physically and mentally making my own decisions. If I jump, sit, sleep, eat, smile, yell, or laugh, each I have complete control over those choices (whether I’m predestined to do them or not).
I’ll try to present a brief anology, but it will fall short of proving effective unless you do your best to stretch your imagination a little. The whole problem with an anology on this topic is it is an attempt to explain God with human consructs, I find that’s not quite possible. You’ve probably seen one of those magic tricks online where you read a series of things and then say the first word that comes to your mind, “carrot” and low and behold there it is when you scroll down the very word you where thinking of. The reason they knew is because people simply tend to choose that word. But they didn’t FORCE you to choose that word. Now, what if we just always chose that word, that’s just the way people are…would that mean we suddenly lost our free-will? Now multiple that infinity times.

To Be Continued… (In other words, at some point I WILL talk about which I believe [I’m not quite sure yet] and why).

Interview with Adria : Coffee Lover Extraordinaire

After a morning hanging out with Adria and helping her get ready to do her own podcast I couldn’t let her go with out you getting a chance to hear a little from her and some of the things she’s interested in. I hope you enjoy Adria’s podcasting debut and stay tuned for links to her upcoming podcasts.

powered by ODEO
Or Download it here. (Right click and hit “Save link as…”

Shownotes:

  • Adria shares her thoughts on fair trade coffee and Bongo Java’s story.
  • You hear it hear first: Adria’s business venture
  • Adria has a long line of entrepenuers in her family

Read more of Adria’s Thoughts, writings, and soon to be Podcast:

Interview with Peter Amico about AIDS

I had the great opportunity to talk with my friend Peter Amico on the other side of the globe in China! I decided to do a short interview with him so that he could share his story with a great audience. Here’s a brief interview with him, which I’m sure I will do more of in the months to come.

NOTE: The quality of the podcast is quite clear considering the long distance connection. However, the recording software caused some overlap of my and Peter’s voices. Though a little distracting, you should know that Peter wasn’t constantly interrupting me before I finished my question, and I was listening and answering quickly (not five seconds late). I hope you can still enjoy the podcast.

Or Download the podcast here.

Please Take a minute and stop by the site:
Peter’s AIDS Fund

Peter wants to remind you to check out Isaiah 1:11-17